Is the Transfer Portal Ruining College Football?
- Elizabeth MacBey
- 16 hours ago
- 6 min read
College football has always thrived on tradition: rivalries passed down through generations, packed student sections, and stars who felt tied to a program for life.
But in the modern era, one force has disrupted that sense of permanence more than anything else.
The transfer portal.
Currently, more than 25% of college football players are in the transfer portal. But let's get something straight, the portal isn’t some instantaneous tunnel to a new school. It’s a database, a formal signal that a player is open to being recruited elsewhere. Crucially, players can’t just jump whenever they feel like it. For football this offseason, the NCAA-approved single portal window ran from January 2 to January 16.
Still, the bigger issue isn’t the database itself. It’s what happens around it, especially once NIL and school-linked revenue-sharing agreements enter the picture.
What was designed to give athletes more freedom and control over their careers has quickly become one of the most polarizing developments in the sport’s history. Some fans see long-overdue empowerment. Others see an unregulated free-agency era that threatens the very identity of college football.
This season, the debate reached a boiling point thanks to two storylines that captured the portal era’s emotional whiplash: Duke’s legal move against QB Darian Mensah, and Washington’s standoff with QB Demond Williams Jr.
The Transfer Portal Era: Power to the Players
Overall, the transfer portal is simple. It allows players to enter their names into a national database, signaling that they are open to being recruited by other programs. With relaxed eligibility rules and immediate playing time often available, movement across the college football landscape has never been faster.
The portal is an attempt to correct an old imbalance.
Before, coaches could leave for better jobs overnight, while players were expected to stay put, even if their position coach got fired, the offensive system changed, or promises quietly disappeared.
The portal now gives athletes a way out: more playing time, better development, a scheme fit, or simply a fresh start. This is a massive shift in power, and with that, freedom has come chaos. Rosters now turn over at a pace that rivals professional leagues. Fans struggle to keep up with who’s staying, who’s going, and who might arrive next. For programs without deep NIL resources or national brand recognition, the fear of becoming a “feeder school” has never felt more real.
Duke vs. Darian Mensah: When “Free Agency” Meets Contracts
No storyline shows the new legal gray area better than Duke quarterback Darian Mensah.
On January 20, 2026, Duke filed a lawsuit to enforce the terms of Mensah's contract, an unusually aggressive escalation that signals where college sports may be heading.
Duke will honor Mensah’s request and enter his name into the transfer portal. But the university is also seeking a temporary restraining order that would prevent him from enrolling at another school to play football. In doing so, Duke is signaling that while it will allow Mensah to explore his options, it still expects him to comply with the terms of his contract.
Mensah now proposes to move on to another collegiate institution as if his obligations to Duke no longer exist. The facts themselves are not in dispute, but contracts mean something.
For now, Duke fans can hold back their tears, as it doesn’t appear Mensah will be going anywhere just yet. Still, this fight is bigger than one player. It’s about whether modern NIL and revenue-sharing agreements can be treated like enforceable contracts in practice, and what happens when an athlete tries to leave mid-deal. In other words, player autonomy is expanding, but the contracts around the sport are expanding too, and the two are colliding.
Washington’s QB Saga: Loyalty vs. Leverage
Few moments capture the emotional whiplash of the portal era like the situation at the University of Washington (UW).
QB Demond Williams Jr. entered the transfer portal days after signing a deal reported in the mid-$4 million range to return. The quarterback’s decision to enter the transfer portal sent shockwaves through the fanbase and management. Ultimately leading them to threaten litigation against Williams to enforce the NIL license agreement with the Big 10 school.
Williams’ side leaned on a familiar athlete argument: I have to do what’s best for my future. Washington’s posture leaned on a newer institutional argument: If you signed a compensation-linked agreement and try to leave mid-term, there may be financial consequences.
Here’s the contradiction fans keep tripping over: athletes are repeatedly told, in legal and policy language, they are “not employees.” However, the system is starting to look and function like employment, money, performance expectations, exclusivity clauses, disputes, and now litigation threats.
The chaos got even louder when Williams’ agent publicly dropped him as a client, citing “philosophical differences.”
Williams ultimately decided to stay at Washington, who knows what ($$) or who changed his mind, but it has now triggered an investigation into the school for tampering by the NCAA.
But this episode became a flashing warning light for the sport: the portal era isn’t just a roster-building era. It’s a contract-enforcement era, too. Fans want heroes who stay and build legacies. Players want careers that maximize development, exposure, and financial opportunity. In today’s system, those goals don’t always align.
Indiana’s Rise: A Portal Success Story
On the other end of the spectrum sits Indiana, a program that became one of the season’s most compelling examples of how the transfer portal can transform a team overnight.
After their quarterback entered the portal and made the move to Bloomington, Indiana’s offense found a new identity. What had once been a rebuilding project suddenly looked like a contender. The team climbed the rankings, gained national attention, and shifted the narrative around what was possible for a program outside the traditional power structure.
This is the version of the portal that its supporters point to. Instead of hoarding talent at the top, movement can redistribute it. Players get opportunities to lead. Programs get a chance to compete. The sport, in theory, becomes more balanced and unpredictable.
Indiana’s surge wasn’t just about one player. It was about fit. The system matched the quarterback’s strengths, the coaching staff built around his skill set, and the result was a team that looked faster, more confident, and more dangerous every week.
The Championship Counterpoint: Stability and Adaptation
If the portal is “ruining” college football, you’d expect the top end of the sport to look like chaos, too.
But the championship game suggested something more nuanced, with both teams having multiple "portal players" on the field. The modern title formula isn’t purely homegrown development or purely portal shopping. It’s increasingly a blend of culture and continuity, plus targeted additions that patch weaknesses.
The portal isn’t replacing traditional team-building. It’s becoming part of it, but we need to find a better way to combine it with current structures.
So…Is the Portal Ruining the Game, or Redefining It?
The real question isn’t whether the portal is good or bad.
It’s whether college football is willing to accept what it’s becoming.
Critics argue that constant movement erodes rivalries, weakens fan attachment, and turns student-athletes into short-term rentals. Supporters counter that the “old system” often trapped players in situations that didn’t serve them, while coaches had the freedom that players didn’t.
What’s clear: the sport is in an identity shift. College football is no longer just about where you committed out of high school. It’s about where you fit, where you grow, and where you can make the biggest impact.
What’s the Game Plan?
If schools are going to operate like employers, through pay structures, exclusivity clauses, performance expectations, and legal enforcement, then the sport needs actual guardrails.
One path is formalizing what everyone is tiptoeing around: a system where athlete compensation is collectively structured and protected, rather than improvised deal-by-deal and challenged in court.
It will be messy, but right now, the mess is happening anyway, just without a stable structure underneath it.
The Future of Saturdays
The Duke lawsuit and the Washington standoff show two sides of the same portal-era coin. One highlights the legal collision coming fast. The other shows the emotional cost when tradition runs into a marketplace.
The transfer portal isn’t necessarily ruining college football.
But it is forcing everyone, schools, athletes, fans, and the NCAA, to rethink what loyalty, tradition, and team-building mean in a new era.
One thing hasn’t changed, though. On Saturdays, when the lights come on and the bands start playing, the stakes still feel just as high.
The drama is still real.
It’s just wearing a different jersey than it used to.
Edited by: Megan Livengood