The WNBA’s Reckoning: When Its Players Became the Grown-Ups in the Room
- elizabethmacbey
- 1 day ago
- 5 min read
The WNBA is living through its most visible, successful, and volatile era all at once. Ratings are up, arenas are fuller, and stars like Caitlin Clark, Paige Bueckers, and Angel Reese have pulled the league into the mainstream. Yet beneath the highlight reels and rising sponsorships lies a quieter crisis, one that the league’s own athletes are refusing to ignore.
In the past week, a wave of WNBA players, led by Napheesa Collier, have called out Commissioner Cathy Engelbert and the league’s leadership, accusing them of failing to protect, respect, and properly represent the players who built the sport. Their message is simple, raw, and long overdue: we deserve better.
“The Worst Leadership in the World”

After her team’s playoff exit, Lynx forward Napheesa Collier didn’t offer the usual polished soundbites. Instead, she detonated the conversation: “We have the best players in the world,” she said, “but the worst leadership.”
Collier accused Engelbert and her team of ignoring player concerns, deflecting accountability, and downplaying legitimate issues, from inconsistent officiating to collective bargaining failures. She also alleged that Engelbert told players they should be “grateful” for the league’s growth and television deals, a remark Collier said captured everything wrong with the power dynamic.
That accusation hit like a thunderclap. Within days, stars like Sophie Cunningham and even rookies such as Caitlin Clark publicly echoed their frustration. For them, this wasn’t just about bad refereeing or corporate tone. It was about the soul of the league itself.
The Cracks Beneath the Surface
The WNBA’s problems aren’t isolated complaints. They’re the symptoms of an organization whose structure hasn’t evolved as quickly as its talent or audience.

1. Officiating and Credibility
Players have pleaded for years for improved officiating, not perfection, but accountability. Missed calls and inconsistent enforcement have become weekly storylines, leaving players feeling gaslit when they speak up. “It’s like we’re expected to stay quiet,” Collier said. “But silence only benefits those already in power.”
2. The CBA and Fair Compensation
While the league’s valuation and media deals have skyrocketed, player compensation remains disproportionately low. The infamous prioritization clause, forcing players to report to training camp even if they’re under contract overseas, exemplifies this disconnect. Instead of empowering women to maximize their earning potential globally, the rule effectively punishes ambition.
3. A Culture of Dismissal
What has stung players the most isn’t just policy, it’s tone. When athletes raise concerns, they often hear deflection instead of dialogue. The commissioner’s “be grateful” comment became shorthand for that larger culture: one that confuses leadership with control, and growth with gratitude.
4. Lack of Basketball Voices in Leadership

As Sophie Cunningham put it bluntly: “They might be great business people, but they don’t know s*** about basketball.” It’s an unfiltered critique, but one that resonates. Too many WNBA decisions, from scheduling to broadcast strategy, appear to be made from a boardroom, not a locker room. The league has the heart of a movement, but sometimes the mind of a corporation.
Leadership’s Response - and Why It Isn’t Enough
Cathy Engelbert, to her credit, didn’t hide. In an interview with the Purdue Exponent, she said she was “disheartened” by the criticism and promised to “do better.” She acknowledged that “if players don’t feel valued, that’s on us.”
But Cathy, come on. At this point, the league doesn’t need another round of carefully worded empathy statements. The players aren’t asking for reassurance; they’re demanding results. Enough of the polished PR. It’s time to trade talking points for tangible action.
Real leadership means creating a system where accountability flows in both directions. It means giving the players’ union, the WNBPA, a legitimate seat at the decision-making table. It means independent officiating oversight, transparent communication, and leadership evaluations that measure not just profit but trust.
What Reform Could Look Like
If Engelbert is serious about rebuilding trust, here’s what a real turnaround could involve:
Independent Referee Oversight: A joint committee, including players, that publicly reviews officiating quality, errors, and accountability measures.
CBA Transparency: Full access to revenue data, guaranteed salary growth tied to league profits, and the elimination of punitive scheduling rules.
Player Representation in Governance: At least two current or former players on the league’s executive board.
Accountability Metrics: Annual “State of the League” reports on player satisfaction, grievance resolution, and fairness in travel, rest, and scheduling.
Cultural Shift: Replace “be grateful” with “be heard.” Make communication a practice, not a performance.

The Courage to Call It Out
What’s inspiring about this moment is not the outrage, it’s the courage. Collier and Cunningham could have stayed silent, collected their checks, and let PR smooth things over. Instead, they chose confrontation in the service of progress.
That courage carries lineage. From Sheryl Swoopes’ fight for maternity rights to Nneka Ogwumike’s leadership in past CBA negotiations, WNBA players have always been at the frontlines of change. This generation is no different, only louder, more unified, and more unwilling to accept crumbs when they’ve earned a seat at the feast.
Their message isn’t destructive; it’s visionary. They want a league that grows with them, not at their expense.
A Call to Grow Up
For years, fans and journalists have urged the public to “take women’s sports seriously.” Now, the league’s own players are issuing that same challenge inward. The WNBA cannot keep asking to be viewed as a professional powerhouse while treating its athletes like a marketing accessory.

Growth demands maturity, and maturity means facing uncomfortable truths.
Cathy Engelbert’s tenure has produced real wins: higher salaries, expansion talk, and sponsorships. But leadership isn’t only about building bigger; it’s about building better. The women of this league are not rebellious; they’re responsible. They are calling out dysfunction not because they’ve lost faith in the WNBA, but because they love it too much to let it stagnate.
The Moment Ahead
This is the WNBA’s crossroads. It can respond with defensiveness or with evolution. It can cling to control, or it can embrace collaboration.
If the league listens, acts, and reforms, this controversy could be remembered not as a collapse but as a rebirth. The players are showing the blueprint: radical honesty, shared governance, and a refusal to settle for symbolic progress.
The truth is, they don’t want to tear the system down. They want to build something worthy of their talent. And in doing so, they’re teaching every sports institution, men’s or women’s, what real leadership looks like.
Because leadership isn’t about keeping the peace. It’s about earning the players’ trust, and right now, the players are the only ones leading.
Edited by: Megan Livengood
Comments